Last Saturday I was with some students invited by their teacher, a good friend, to take a stroll through the Sierra de Madrid. The tour was very pleasant. Mojamos us a lot, since those days it was raining a little bit in Spain. But that is part of life in nature. The water does not pass the skin, and nothing happens to get wet. Did not we do it every day in the shower?
The students, most of which has always lived in the city, unaware of two things of nature. One, the horrific act of genetic survival of the gene better able to reproduce. The second, the inevitable laws of that nature, the laws of physics.
These two
ignorance, repeated in the political, financial and entrepreneurs from around the world, we have brought to the predicament in which we find ourselves and that we will only think that if we give people money to banks. But who gives money to us so that we give money to banks?
Same banks, in a system that bites its tail. The practice is supposed us out of the crisis stems from a theory false and haggard, the current economic theory that was built in the nineteenth century and which only considers the flow of capital, never his generation.
Without wealth creation will continue to worsen the crisis indefinite, as in real life the law governing the growth of entropy.
These political, financial and entrepreneurs spend their lives in offices, surrounded by concrete and asphalt. Occasionally lead them (because they do not go) as citizens some hunts as the boring business that fill their lives. They kill some partridges, some rabbits, even from time to time stags that some few them closer to the 4x4 with the touring fields without stain the boots or move muscles.
Think that is the human being who makes the laws of life. Leaving aside the unlikely possibility that the current crisis is a huge scam to steal money from citizens (financial celebrating that states spent millions have bought their businesses, rulers happy to be able to control even more money from citizens), the crisis, if it is real, ignoring derived from these natural laws, and especially one of them, this law of growth of entropy, which tells us that if we do not act efficiently, the systems have just stopped by accumulation of entropy, energy useless.
Human being, especially financial ones that sell and buy on the stock exchanges, it is believed freed from those laws, firmly believes (even the crooks) that the meals are free and do not have to pay what one does.
His time scale is the primate, the hour or day, and they reject that life is lived through years, decades and millennia. And not just financial. A certain majority of the population, bred in the city, assumes that others will pay what they do, what they spend. That there are some 'rights' that require human nature to look after them and protect them do what they do. That is the idea of the welfare state.
Need to go back to nature, to see it, feel it, understand it. To understand that in nature there is no free lunch, and to pay for everything that is done. To understand that the struggle for life and the triumph of the more 'fit' is a strategy of the genes to ensure their spread, but we, human beings, because we do not have to follow that strategy.
These days I am proposing a new city. The city in which we live is a legacy of a very primitive, like religion in that we are and almost all other religions.
Many thousands of years ago, humans learned to control the energy we could capture: the domestication of photosynthesis were guaranteed at our disposal, on a regular basis, a certain amount of energy daily or yearly.
Before that the energy that we could access was limited and collection of very irregular. We set the cities to keep that energy, which collected once a year, or a few times a year.
Force to gather this energy were some machines called human bodies and animal bodies (slaves and beasts of burden), and to get that energy was needed fertile soil. The wars of the past 8000 years has always been to capture slaves and to get ground clearance work and energy.
The last two world wars and the recent skirmish Ossetia, are relics of something that is no longer necessary, but in whose pointlessness (land and machinery alive) human beings are not given as much time.
The city was compact, hierarchical, with walls. The richness of the city should return to it every night and be protected from others that wanted. It was developed trade, but this trade stemmed from available sources of energy.
What are the cities of today, but those relics of primitive forms of addressing the need to define a living being, the pursuit of power?
Today
Cities remain hierarchical, and even if the wealth is not. The cities still have walls, but these are not stone. And cities claim to be the sites of accumulation of wealth (such as wheat silos) even if the wealth is now spread throughout the globe.
Today
Wars are pointless, because the wealth that provide human beings are their minds, and they can not conquer, or at least can not be won through war, although it was conquered by marketing, propaganda and television.
Today, the land has ceased to have any value, because energy can be obtained from any square kilometer in area, whether it be fertile or not.
The compact city of ancient humans had direct contact with nature, then had to go out every day to the surrounding fields. In cities today, inheritors of those, humans do not see nature.
Must recreate today the concept of the city. Today, the three basic ideas that forced this concept have disappeared. Today we do not need to save in silos products of the earth, since the food is really where it is on boats, trains and trucks, always in motion.
Today, the fertile land is not the main source of energy, but so is any planet's surface, roofs and facades of buildings, deserts and mountain slopes.
Today
Are useless walls, as if this attack comes from the sky. Today the concept of 'king' in his throne has disappeared, although there are some who would like to restore things to their advantage.
Of all the concepts
Side of town are some who may still be valid. The city provides contact between anonymous people, enabling nullifying the concept of tribal and feudal system closed.
The city provides local commercial exchanges between their citizens. It offers a reasonable schedule of entertainment, provided that its size is not excessive. From a certain size allows a choice of products and services impossible for cities where that size is small.
Joining the disappearance of the concepts of primary city with the maintenance of the desirable side, and adding to enable can return to being in close contact with nature, a substantial saving of energy in transportation, and power generation site that eliminates substantial losses of the same and enables the elimination of monopolies in the only real wealth generation, we arrive at a model city in the twenty-first century.
A network of medium-sized cities. With public squares but no center. Each city must be hair, large, non-hierarchical, with local transportation by bicycle and / or similar means of public transport semi-electric, automated and no more distant from each home / office 10 minutes away.
Electric interurban transportation and automated. Local generation of energy whose need is minimized through saving designs. With a nature domesticated, but plentiful and close, based in parks but not in forests, ie with high density of trees and meadows interspersed between buildings and neighborhoods.
This latest proposal is nothing more than an outline of a possibility to start a series of research / debate. One controversial proposal, which sought to give life to some questions needed.
Do we do it?